🔗 Share this article

The decision by the DNC to withhold the publication regarding its own post-election analysis on the 2024 election appears remarkable yet to be expected. Resistant to frank assessments, the party's leadership apparatus behaves closer to a PR firm rather than a political organization committed to cultivating a volunteer base for winning elections.

A Climate Resistant to Internal Critique

Reluctant to depart from the party establishment's culture of conformity, the DNC has remained within the Biden-Harris shadow throughout this past year. Publishing such a report would have indicated that party leaders truly desire to promote open debate about the missteps which allowed Donald Trump to win re-election. Instead, the leadership is moving forward as if there is little to be learned from the tragic debacle of 2024.

Our guiding principle: will this lead to victory? Should the answer be negative, it’s a distraction from the core mission," a justification reportedly given to justify concealing the document.

Major Failures a Report Could Have Explored

Any valuable post-mortem with any value would confront a series of difficult topics. These include:

• Electoral Alienation: Failing to retain among millions of voters that backed the Democratic ticket in 2020 became a critical factor during the tight recent race.
• The Choice to Seek Re-election: The stubborn choice by a party leader to stay in the race, alongside an extremely delayed exit, has been criticized as robbing Democratic voters of open primaries.
• Losing Touch With the Working-Class Base: Amid economic anxiety, the campaign allegedly ceding to powerful financial backers without successfully attempting to address the impact of profit-seeking.
• The Gaza Factor: The failure to reconsider an approach concerning a major international conflict reportedly led to alienating many voters, particularly among young people, Arab-Americans, and Muslim Americans.
• Eroding Youth Support: Polling data indicates a major drop-off of Democratic support from young voters.

A Pattern Avoiding Accountability

Choosing secrecy fits a pattern of sidestepping uncomfortable facts. It echoes an episode where virtually every Democratic officeholder in Congress went along with a sitting president's insistence on running for re-election until a disastrous public debate performance led to a reversal.

At the same time, large majorities of Democratic voters had been repeatedly informing researchers that they did not want the incumbent to run again.

Campaign Spending Concerns

A substantive analysis would also probe questions about where money went, including the amounts went to high-priced advisors as well as ad buyers during an electoral effort which expended an enormous war chest in a short period.

A Broader Issue

Fundamentally, the blockage of the official autopsy is symptomatic of a submission toward the established hierarchy responsible for a losing presidential campaign. The signal to the party's base – which includes millions of dedicated activists – is that they cannot have a right to understand what the insiders say they discovered based on a report based on conversations with insiders.

A political entity unwilling to critically review its own failings will struggle to break free from the pattern that proved so beneficial to the rival party.